Using Unitel insurance to cover your business needs can be a great idea. It’s a safe way to ensure your employees’ coverage. You can also get discounts for your business if you sign up for a package of insurance plans. But be sure to ask the right questions before you choose a plan.
Theodore Mlsna’s resignation with notice
Upon Theodore Mlsna’s resignation with notice, Unitel was required to provide medical continuation coverage to Eileen Mlsna. This was a qualifying event for COBRA purposes. However, it is still being determined when this occurred.
Unitel filed a third-party complaint against Theodore Mlsna for gross misconduct. The complaint alleged that Mlsna stole Unitel customers and employees. In addition, it claimed that Mlsna failed to properly maintain and account for company receivables and unwarranted advances for other employees.
The district court heard conflicting testimony regarding Mlsna’s involvement with a new venture. While Mlsna testified that he had nothing to do with the experience until after he left Unitel, Mallin testified that Mlsna had been running the company from the beginning.
While both parties agree that Mlsna failed to comply with the requirements of Unitel’s claims procedure, they differ as to whether Mlsna was guilty of gross misconduct. The majority opinion is based on technical considerations and does not address whether Mlsna committed gross misconduct.
Evidence of delinquent job performance
Considering that it is the man’s home, Unitel Insurance will have few competitors to play with. The company has a history of bad behaviour and a tumultuous work environment. While a few months at the helm does not make one squeamish, it isn’t the first time one has been abrased.
It is no doubt that those mentioned above were responsible for any number of mishaps. The company has some well-intentioned employees who are not so fortunate. A few high fliers are in the know and not prone to a good hard knock.
Eileen Mlsna’s failure to submit her claims
Whether Unitel’s failure to provide Eileen Mlsna’s notice of the right to continue medical insurance coverage after her husband’s termination of employment violated the COBRA statute depends on the facts of the case. The statutory statute requires written notice to a covered spouse, but the regulation also conceives of a spouse as a person in their own right.
After Eileen Mlsna was notified that her husband had been terminated, she incurred substantial medical bills. The insurance did not cover the statements that she had obtained through NIS. But, she was still dependent on her husband’s employment. Despite this, she had no duty to submit claims to Unitel.
At trial, the district court heard conflicting evidence about Mlsna’s involvement with a new venture. Mlsna testified that he had no involvement with the experience until after his employment with Unitel ended.
Mlsna’s actions as controller at Unitel resulted in high unnecessary costs for the company. In addition, Mlsna needed to maintain adequate financial records for the company. The lending bank required these records. He also submitted unwarranted advances to other Unitel employees.